Chickenese
|
Chickenese
(Please note, this is just for fun)
Chickenese
- the BackgroundChickenese
was originally created and documented as a joke in 1996 for a comedy/horror story
I wrote called War of the Chickens, and was published in a zine called Basically
Insane. It remained un-webified (is this a real word? It is now!) until
2004 when I discovered a reference online to another humorous and wonderful conlang
(constructed language) called Chicken (click for the conlang profile; click
for the original page of Chicken
itself). In response to this, I decided to launch the Chickenese website.
These two conceptually similar languages were developed independently at
probably the same time for the same aim: just for fun. And by the way, the
chicken pictures are from www.freefoto.com
with modifications. The Paxo picture is my own.
And
now on with the real Chickenese stuff.
Many linguists and animal psychologists
have sought to discover if mankind is the sole species to have developed language.
Recent experiments with chickens in Foxchester University, in Foxchester, England,
have discovered that mankind is no longer alone.
The language discovered has been
dubbed Chickenese by linguists. All attempts to quantify grammar have failed;
linguists believe Chickenese has little (if any) grammar. The current theory is
that, due to the small size of the brain of the domesticated chicken and the
limited vocabulary of the chicken species, thought processes are not developed
enough to develop grammar, although repetition has been observed. Repetition is
believed to have no significance grammatically by most chickenists.
Semantically Chickenese is
also a curiosity, due to each word taking on such a variety of meanings that it
is almost impossible to tie each Chickenese word to an equating idea or concept
in a human language. On the other hand Chickenese, although a lexicographer’s nightmare,
provides an excellent foundation for further study of the Sapir-Whorf
hypothesis, which states that thought processes are influenced by language and
vice versa. With the limited and minimalist vocabulary in Chickenese, there is
much leeway for further study.
The only exception to semantic vagaries is the pejorative
Chickenese word paxo. With no direct equivilent in a human language,
apart from a cultural reference to a brand of stuffing sold in the UK, paxo
is extremely pejorative in Chickenese. It should be avoided at all costs when
talking to a chicken. Use of the word paxo has, on occasion, caused
linguists to receive a peck to the ankle from an infuriated chicken.
Due to the vagaries of
Chickenese, the English definitions are to be taken as approximations only.
|
Chickenese |
English |
|
b'k |
General,
all-purpose word |
|
bok |
General,
all-purpose word, negative meaning |
|
bwark |
General,
all-purpose word, positive meaning |
|
paxo |
Pejorative |
It
is common to translate the Babel text from the Bible, Genesis 11:1-9 as an
example of a language.
Further
Babel texts in various languages (both natural and constructed) can be found here.
The Chickenese
Babel text is as follows:
The
new Teach Yourself Chickenese book from Hodder and Stoughton will soon be
available, illustrated on this page, enabling every chickenist to learn
Chickenese fluently.
Chapter
headings include:
(C)
2004 Damon M. Lord wessisc@wessisc.co.uk